Data, AI & Capability

Life-science AI workflow advisory

Domain-informed design of AI-assisted workflows, starting with the task, the evidence and the people accountable for the result.

Best for
Biotech teams, specialist consultancies and research-technology groups
Typical format
Bounded advisory sprint
Most relevant at
All stages
AI-assisted workflow with human reviewSource documents pass through a scoped AI-assisted step to qualified clinician review, with corrections returning to the workflow. Schematic illustration; it contains no data.SourcedocumentsAI-assisted stepscoped pilotQualifiedclinician review(human in control)Useor stopCorrections return to the workflowMeasured against a baseline

What this involves

  • Workflow diagnosisThe actual task, its information sources, hand-offs, decisions and rework, and where expert judgment cannot be delegated.
  • Use-case prioritizationCandidate uses compared on value, risk, data availability and the review burden they create.
  • Human-review designWho verifies what, against which sources, and how errors are caught and recorded.
  • Pilot specificationAcceptance criteria, a representative sample and a measured baseline to compare against.
  • Adoption planningGovernance, training and the handling of confidential inputs.

Why it matters in oncology

An AI demonstration usually shows the easy part. The hard work remains: verifying sources, handling exceptions, protecting confidential inputs and keeping an accountable expert in the loop.

For a specialist team the question is seldom which model to use. It is which task, evaluated how, and reviewed by whom. A bounded pilot measured against a real baseline is the quickest route to a reliable answer.

When to involve us

  • Repeated manual workin literature, evidence or document review.
  • A scatter of AI experimentswith no clear priority or owner.
  • A need for a controlled pilotbefore wider rollout.
  • Vendor claimsthat need to be tested against how your team works.

How we approach it

  1. Observe the workflow as it is done today.
  2. Choose one bounded use case with a clear owner.
  3. Design the pilot and the review: acceptance criteria, sample and reviewers.
  4. Evaluate against the baseline and decide whether to stop, adjust or extend.

What you receive

  • A current-state workflow and opportunity map
  • A prioritized AI use-case assessment
  • A pilot specification and human-review design
  • An evaluation and implementation roadmap

Working together

  • StructureA bounded advisory sprint, followed where appropriate by a separately scoped prototype or implementation with technical contributors.
  • What we need from youA representative workflow, authorized sample materials, the current review process and a named business owner.
  • Roles and limitsChoosing a tool does not establish security, compliance or suitability for regulated use. Engineering, data handling, validation and maintenance requirements have to be defined for the actual use. DrugDevX is developing its own AI-assisted capabilities, and we say so where it is relevant.

Questions

Do you begin by choosing an AI platform?

No. The first step is to understand the task and the acceptance criteria. A simpler process change may serve better than a new platform.

Can you help with implementation?

Implementation can be scoped with technical contributors once the use case, review design and acceptance criteria are agreed.

Start a conversation

Discuss this service.

Tell us about the program, the question and the timing. We will respond about fit, expertise and next steps.

Email links open your email application. Nothing is sent until you press send. Please do not include patient information or confidential study materials in a first message.